If science can accept as likely the existence of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, why can it not accept as plausible the existence of an evolved form of being somewhere in the universe with the ability to design and create other life?
Intelligent life can be defined as living entities able to create things that would not naturally be a part of the natural world. Humans are intelligent because we have crafted from the elements such items as computers, skyscrapers, airplanes, etc. This proves there are creators in the universe…us! So not only is it plausible, but it would seem highly likely that there must be a form of life somewhere that are also creators and that have developed higher capabilities of creation — possibly even the ability to create worlds and life upon them.
Moreover, how can we possibly place a heavy burden of proof upon this assertion? You could travel back in time five hundred years, and bring every iota of knowledge about the supercomputer with you. They would burn you at the stake no matter the logical ground you stand upon. They were less evolved. They wouldn’t be able to comprehend what you were trying to teach them or explain to them. So it would be if there was a creator of this world, of this galaxy, of this universe. We are not evolved enough to comprehend such a being or his knowledge.
The Theory of Evolution takes the route that because microevolution exists, macroevolution must exist. Well, I will take the same track. Because micro creation exists, macro creation must exist.